Page 4 of 4

Posted: 01 Jun 2006, 22:51
by canhoto
Kid Cro wrote:nfs 5??? For me best NFS is UG2!
damn i only have the underground series and mw and i can asure you that even u1 is less boring than u2...my favorite is mw

Posted: 01 Jun 2006, 23:21
by Toshiro
Favorite was Underground. Even though it didn't have cops, it was easier on my eyes to not watch rice rockets in MW race around town.....

Posted: 01 Jun 2006, 23:32
by Kid Cro
WTF!!! How can you see other cars? That is not possible! What are you talking about?

Posted: 01 Jun 2006, 23:37
by xHaZxMaTx
After a race the other racers still drive around town.

Posted: 01 Jun 2006, 23:40
by BKize_GT
And then they hit a wall and dissapear off the map, but they can be cruising for up to 2-7 minutes..

Posted: 01 Jun 2006, 23:54
by Kid Cro
Yeah that I know! But what is that guy talking about then?

Posted: 02 Jun 2006, 00:21
by xHaZxMaTx
...If you don't understand what he is saying after two people have already explained, why don't you try... I don't know, I can't think of anything clever right now.

Posted: 02 Jun 2006, 13:13
by Kid Cro
It seems to me that you dont understand either, so why dont you try?
What to try when I know that there are no other cars in MW at least tuned!
I dont play MW from yesterday!

Most Wanted...

Posted: 06 Jun 2006, 01:24
by SkeeteRX7
canhoto wrote:
Kid Cro wrote:nfs 5??? For me best NFS is UG2!
damn i only have the underground series and mw and i can asure you that even u1 is less boring than u2...my favorite is mw
Most Wanted was a good replacement for Hot Pursuit 2, but not a sutiable one for Underground 2. It needed the realistic tuning of Underground 2 (and Porsche Unleashed)

Posted: 06 Jun 2006, 10:51
by TheStig
Guys Keep on topic!

this topic was not about wich NFS is the best or wich is a simulation!

It is not about Underground 1 or 2!
So get back to topic!!!!

Posted: 06 Jun 2006, 10:52
by Kid Cro
Well its compleatly diferent style of game coz they put all in making police and new race modes! So they just left tuning on side! See that tuning is soo bad and we have small choice!

Posted: 06 Jun 2006, 10:55
by TheStig
OK KNOCK IT OFF!

GET BACK TO THE ORIGINAL TOPIC
or I will lock it!

And if You don't know what the topic was about?? Please start reading the pages!
And NO it is Not about the AI in MW or the Tuning in MW, first Read the topic Tittle and then the first post maybe you will uderstand it!

Posted: 06 Jun 2006, 18:42
by Kid Cro
Ok ok ok relax! Look the time of posting I did not read your warning and continue to go offtopic!

Posted: 06 Jun 2006, 22:09
by SkeeteRX7
My mom has an AWD, dad has FWD, I have an RWD.

2001 Subaru Outback Limited Wagon.

Great to carry stuff, has leather and heated seats. Originally she was going to get the redesigned Outback 2.5XT Limited with a 250 bhp turbo H4, but she found a great deal on this 2001 used model. Its weak on highways, but lively around town.

1995 Buick LeSabre Custom.

Big GM 3800 (Series II) V6, 220 hp makes it powerful. My dad got it from my great-aunt. It also, surprisingly, gets the same mileage as the Subaru. Very torquey, and comfortable in front and back. No CD player and tachometer, and the paint is chipped, but it allows my dad to pull 100 on the freeway with cops not even batting an eye. He wants to replace it with an Acura TL this fall.

Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 00:00
by Kid Cro
To pull 100?? What km/h or mp/h??

Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 00:50
by SkeeteRX7
Kid Cro wrote:To pull 100?? What km/h or mp/h??
mp/h.

Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 11:18
by canhoto
i actually would prefer having an awd car rather than fwd or rwd...they may understeer and oversteer at high speeds sometimes(and sometimes even do both at the same time)
but i think thats what makes them easier to drive if they have a good driver behind the wheel


what i cant understand is why do manufacturers make such powerfull cars with rwd...it will make them almost impossible to steer...imo at least

Posted: 08 Jun 2006, 14:57
by Kid Cro
First coz they don't care if you are gona crash or not! For them is important to sell a car no mather what!
Second coz there are ppls who know to drive RWD cars!
Third coz they have much better acceleration than FWD cars! :wink:
Fourth coz they are great for drifting! But that is not what they amming to!

Re: AWD v FWD v BWD

Posted: 25 Feb 2009, 14:53
by topsy kret1
TO ANY AND ALL: what would you rather have and why:

a) Evo X
b) Ferrari F430 Scuderia
c) Rouch "Black Jack" Mustang
d) RX-7 ('94)

Re: AWD v FWD v BWD

Posted: 25 Feb 2009, 15:55
by topsy kret1
i have a PS2 and an XBOX360. when my XBOX takes a "nap", i get stuck with my PS2. which isn't the worst thing in the world, but i would perfer my 360

Re: AWD v FWD v BWD

Posted: 25 Feb 2009, 15:56
by Andre_online
Wrong place.... and it's a little obvious what people would choose.

Re: AWD v FWD v BWD

Posted: 25 Feb 2009, 16:01
by topsy kret1
ok theen what would you choose?

Re: AWD v FWD v BWD

Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 16:01
by topsy kret1
i'd choose the EvoX (GSR) because it has around 390bhp. it also comes stock with a turbo.

Re: AWD v FWD v BWD

Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 18:08
by prince1142003
Because that's what this topic is about.

Re: AWD v FWD v BWD

Posted: 31 Mar 2013, 10:57
by Bernard
Correct name is RWD (rear wheel drive), not "BWD".
I would choose a AWD/4WD for offroad driving, RWD for drag racing and a FWD for others.