NFSMW requirements

StreekG · Post by **StreekG** » 27 Sep 2005, 03:48

Pabl0z wrote:Yeah well i still ain't buying it... Even with the never gfx-card you would have a lot of problems with doom 3 because your pc would still be worse than mine because my cpu is so much better than a 1.3ghz celeron.

I don't lie man, cpu doesn't matter, its the gfx card that really does the work

Post by **Pabl0z** » 27 Sep 2005, 03:55

Yeah well i think the Radeon 9550 isn't that much better than my Ti4200 128mb with AGP 8X... At least my card was almost as good as the 9600 pro in a test i saw in a magazine. It was actually just as good as the 9600 pro on smaller resolutions but lost about 10-15% on higher resolutions and higher graphics.

StreekG · Post by **StreekG** » 27 Sep 2005, 03:59

Pabl0z wrote:Yeah well i think the Radeon 9550 isn't that much better than my Ti4200 128mb with AGP 8X... At least my card was almost as good as the 9600 pro in a test i saw in a magazine. It was actually just as good as the 9600 pro on smaller resolutions but lost about 10-15% on higher resolutions and higher graphics.

Mines running at 9600XT standard

Ahh the power of oc

Anyway, im not trying to have arguments over whos comp is better, im just saying how it is, my comp runs Doom3 without problems and thats how its always been, im not trying to brag, but its true, that was before the oc also

Theres one downside though, my mum has a big eBay addiction so i don't use the computer very often,

another reason for building my own comp

azzkika · Post by **azzkika** » 27 Sep 2005, 05:30

thaz not hard to believe...i got a p3...800 mhz...256 mb ram...n geforce 4 mx 440 when i got nfsu2...worked quite well on medium....now i got a fx 5200...cheap but good enough for NFS:MW i suppose.

Kid Cro · Post by **Kid Cro** » 27 Sep 2005, 10:56

I have 1.7Ghz 256 Ram GeForce2 and run UG2 on medium settings!

Andre_online · Post by **Andre_online** » 27 Sep 2005, 12:29

Kid Cro wrote:2GB RAM???????? I dont think so!

Why not?? I am using 1GB of RAM...

bashderq · Post by **bashderq** » 27 Sep 2005, 14:24

StreekG wrote:... and since then i played doom3 and got sick of lag so i bought an 256mb Radeon 9550 played it on max graphics with no lag,

and this is on a 1.3ghz Celeron 512 MB

i wont believe you unless you're playing on a small resolution: eg 640x460
my computer is way better than yours and even i cant play D3 on max gfx until i turn down my resolution..i play mine on 800x600

besides that i'm not afraid that MW wont run on this comp..though i think i'll have 2 upgrade my RAM, for future applications....

Kid Cro · Post by **Kid Cro** » 28 Sep 2005, 19:33

Andre_online wrote:
Kid Cro wrote:2GB RAM???????? I dont think so!
Why not?? I am using 1GB of RAM...

Your comps are realy great and powerfull thenn! I am using 256 MB RAM

I am planning to buy another 256 so I will have 512!

2furio · Post by **2furio** » 28 Sep 2005, 21:22

Dudes, 512 RAM is getting old man. If people don't upgrade to 1 gig soon, you'll have major problems. I mean 512 is the low limit.

Stereo · Post by **Stereo** » 28 Sep 2005, 21:52

I have a 1.6GHz Athlon XP and 1500MB RAM and a FX5200 128MB. (and 60GB of free space left)

Kid Cro · Post by **Kid Cro** » 29 Sep 2005, 00:58

Oh god! My friend have 1024MB RAM and he is only thatt I know who have that much MR RAM! Here comps are not so strong like in America or other countryes! Here most people have 256MB and some1 who wanna litlle better preformance and need powerfull comp buy 512!

baadmw · Post by **baadmw** » 29 Sep 2005, 08:17

ive got an important question to make here... do you think MW will run on high settings with these specs?

NVIDIAÂ® GeForceâ„¢ 6600 256 Mb

AMD Athlonâ„¢ 64 3200+

1 Gb DDR-SDRAM

200 Gb Serial ATA

Freeman · Post by **Freeman** » 29 Sep 2005, 09:41

I ask you if the ug2 on my computer run whith medium the mw will run at minimal if that's true then that good because il buy a totaly new comp the top of it's game in my country an athlon 3600+, nvidia geforce fx 7200 and the other stuff i'm still looking 4 :d.

Kid Cro · Post by **Kid Cro** » 29 Sep 2005, 14:23

Maybe it will!

samurilos · Post by **samurilos** » 29 Sep 2005, 15:29

Well i'll have
AMD 64 3200
MSI K8T NEO FISR2(Have already)
ATI RADEON 9800PRO 128mb(have already)
512DDR400

And i'm pretty sure i'll be running it at max or close to max, prolly i'll want another 512ddr if i end up hating the songs in the game and have to resort to my own music via winamp.

I should have those before the release date infact.

StreekG · Post by **StreekG** » 29 Sep 2005, 18:11

bashderq wrote:
StreekG wrote:... and since then i played doom3 and got sick of lag so i bought an 256mb Radeon 9550 played it on max graphics with no lag,

and this is on a 1.3ghz Celeron 512 MB
i wont believe you unless you're playing on a small resolution: eg 640x460
my computer is way better than yours and even i cant play D3 on max gfx until i turn down my resolution..i play mine on 800x600

besides that i'm not afraid that MW wont run on this comp..though i think i'll have 2 upgrade my RAM, for future applications....

i would never ever play on resolution as low as 640x460, thats just gay.... you trying to give me nightmares or something?

When i say doom 3 max graphics with no lag, i play on 800 x 600, there really is no improvement in graphics itself from the full max, just resolution change, and even then i didn't really notice much resolution wise, and im running a 17" LCD, maybe if i had 19"

meh, i'll get one for the comp im building

canhoto · Post by **canhoto** » 29 Sep 2005, 22:44

i can play underground2 with everything to the max except the enhanced contrast and the full screen anti-aliasing...(res:1280x1024)
will i be able to play MW?

my gfx card is an ATI 9200 radeon 128mb

PSZeTa · Post by **PSZeTa** » 29 Sep 2005, 22:56

Freeman wrote:athlon 3600+

Never heard of a 3600..

Freeman wrote:nvidia geforce fx 7200

FX7200? : |

canhoto wrote:i can play underground2 with everything to the max except the enhanced contrast and the full screen anti-aliasing...(res:1280x1024)
will i be able to play MW?

my gfx card is an ATI 9200 radeon 128mb

You probably will be able to, I think you have to turn off more things though.

2furio · Post by **2furio** » 29 Sep 2005, 23:52

What the? This has turned into "Post your computer specs" thread.

StreekG · Post by **StreekG** » 30 Sep 2005, 07:00

AMD 3600+ does exist, they sell them at my local computer store, followed by 3700+, 3800 and 4000.

Never heard of FX7200 but i read about the new 7 series Nvidia cards so it probly exists...

Freeman · Post by **Freeman** » 30 Sep 2005, 07:05

Man just go to the nvidia web site and you will see what i'm talking about.

StreekG · Post by **StreekG** » 30 Sep 2005, 07:06

Freeman wrote:Man just go to the nvidia web site and you will see what i'm talking about.

I know about the 7 series already

samurilos · Post by **samurilos** » 05 Oct 2005, 22:20

I played doom3 on 850mhz, 256mb sdram,fx5200 128mb,at lowest to mid setting of course and i ran and only lagged when i fired my weapons(basically when theres lots of particles)

Plus i play nfsu2 at mid setting and it runs fairly aight but i need to upgrade cuz i want max graphics + max performance from now on.

WonkaVW · Post by **WonkaVW** » 06 Oct 2005, 06:19

baadmw wrote:ive got an important question to make here... do you think MW will run on high settings with these specs?

NVIDIAÂ® GeForceâ„¢ 6600 256 Mb

AMD Athlonâ„¢ 64 3200+

1 Gb DDR-SDRAM

200 Gb Serial ATA

I highly doubt it. The vanilla 6600 isn't really a great card. If you get a 7800GT however you'd be fine and you'd probably even be able to throw on some filtering.

To run MW you'll probably need at least a 2.8 P4 or Sempron 2500+ with 512MB DDR and at least a 9600XT/FX 5800. This would be on minimal settings with playable fps. To get good quality and playable fps I'd recommend at least an Athlon64 3200+, a gig of PC3200 and at least a 6600GT though. Its probably going to be pretty demanding.

WhereIsTheNsx · Post by **WhereIsTheNsx** » 06 Oct 2005, 09:08

most wanted requirements- xbox 360