Performance or Cosmetics?

JDM4LYF · Post by **JDM4LYF** » 04 Sep 2005, 02:37

Which do you worry about most?

Personally, i say performance all the way. The less vynals and smaller the body kit, the better- i say.

makes me wish you werent forced to rice out your car in career mode in UG2. I like to keep the stock body lines of a car.

Sleepers rule!

What do you guys think?

S2000_Skyline12 · Post by **S2000_Skyline12** » 04 Sep 2005, 03:28

i like a tuned car with a nice bodykit

Focer · Post by **Focer** » 04 Sep 2005, 03:49

I go with performance, and for the looks I like upgrades or like front lip. By upgrades I mean something like integra type R front & rear lip, side skirt and spoiler on intagra gs or gsr

Andre_online · Post by **Andre_online** » 04 Sep 2005, 04:31

Id like a car to be highly tuned, and yet the car itself is low profiled, like having a level one kit in NFSU1, little decals and rims.

master m · Post by **master m** » 04 Sep 2005, 13:30

I like both the same.

A sweet veilside kit on a 350z, or a simple Nismo kit. They both look stunning

PSZeTa · Post by **PSZeTa** » 04 Sep 2005, 13:48

I want my ricemobile to look good and go fast! D:<

HKS · Post by **HKS** » 05 Sep 2005, 08:34

Performance all the way, A good looking car that cant keep up, s*cks IMO.

Kid Cro · Post by **Kid Cro** » 05 Sep 2005, 11:33

I wanna something like this! But my is gonna be Golf 4 GTI probably!
This is my friends golf car engine is 2.0 16V 150Hp Enough... This is picture 3 months old and he put 18 on this golf 1 month ago! This is 16! and it has 135db sound system! And on street style has been 5th place!

baadmw · Post by **baadmw** » 05 Sep 2005, 14:59

your friend lives in germany? anyways i prefer power over look but i still like my car to have some small mods, like clear indicators, rims etc.

Fishwhiz · Post by **Fishwhiz** » 05 Sep 2005, 17:10

both. some cars look like crap whebn there stock. but then you will have ppl bing overconfident in winning races

vellu · Post by **vellu** » 05 Sep 2005, 17:15

Andre_online wrote:Id like a car to be highly tuned, and yet the car itself is low profiled, like having a level one kit in NFSU1, little decals and rims.

Exactly. High performance, but just a little something for the keen eye to tell it's not quite stock...

This is real life, in the game I sometimes like hyper-super-riced cars aswell.

NFSBLUECIVIC · Post by **NFSBLUECIVIC** » 05 Sep 2005, 18:39

performance for me

JDM4LYF · Post by **JDM4LYF** » 05 Sep 2005, 20:04

vellu wrote:
Andre_online wrote:Id like a car to be highly tuned, and yet the car itself is low profiled, like having a level one kit in NFSU1, little decals and rims.
Exactly. High performance, but just a little something for the keen eye to tell it's not quite stock...

This is real life, in the game I sometimes like hyper-super-riced cars aswell.

i couldnt have said it better myself. as long as a riced car actually goes fast, its alright, but i prefer the sleeper look that vellu and andre are talkin about.

^Sparco^ · Post by **^Sparco^** » 05 Sep 2005, 21:51

Oh c'mon....

I am the only one who said the truth. I voted "cosmetics" (it's not the best term btw...)

We are talking about nfsu2.

We all care more about the appearance of the car, and not about the performance. That's why everybody prefers brakes level 2 to brakes level 3. And others stick to the level 2 in suspension.

my 0.02$

Pigbenis · Post by **Pigbenis** » 05 Sep 2005, 22:14

Cosmetics, within a certain limit. And a little bit of performance with that

WhereIsTheNsx · Post by **WhereIsTheNsx** » 05 Sep 2005, 23:08

i dunno i got burned by a sleeper car yesterday so i'm leaning towards performance, but the looks get the ladies

JDM4LYF · Post by **JDM4LYF** » 06 Sep 2005, 02:36

WhereIsTheNsx wrote:but the looks get the ladies

^ pretty damn true

Post by **TheStig** » 06 Sep 2005, 04:08

yeah... but by far not my types of girls.... that think a visual tuned (in most cased riced/f*cked up) car is cool...

Hecubus · Post by **Hecubus** » 06 Sep 2005, 04:10

I voted for preformance. The car I use most often in U2 is a cosmetically stock RX8 (well, I painted it, but that's about it), which has all level 3 parts. If I make a concious effort to cosmetically modify a car, I can sometimes make something I'm happy with, but I'm usually satisfied with new paint and rims.

qoots · Post by **qoots** » 06 Sep 2005, 14:02

I love goin fast but when my car is sittin in a parking lot its gotta look good

Flameking · Post by **Flameking** » 06 Sep 2005, 14:04

just paint your car and put a carbon fiber hood. Thats good enough. Performance all the way

Top_Gear · Post by **Top_Gear** » 06 Sep 2005, 16:00

Only cosmetic changes for me are rims andpaint and maybe a small b/k, like those by nismo or mazdaspeed.
Performance all the way after that.

=|Gigiani|= · Post by **=|Gigiani|=** » 06 Sep 2005, 16:41

Im with u Top_Gear

y2kgamer · Post by **y2kgamer** » 06 Sep 2005, 22:39

I go for a balance of both.

PSZeTa · Post by **PSZeTa** » 06 Sep 2005, 23:41

TheStig wrote:yeah... but by far not my types of girls.... that think a visual tuned (in most cased riced/f*cked up) car is cool...

Most girls don't know crap.

They like cars with wheels that pop out of the side with 2 inches. D:

NFSUnlimited.net