Is NFS falling behind?

Post by **TheStig** » 23 Mar 2007, 02:13

arabnight, you don't get it.

No matter how good of a card you have, the SOFTWARE is what makes a game look good, not the GFX card or the PC in general.

EA made the MW look better on the 360, for 1 simple reason MW was a release game for the 360 and they wanted to show what they could do, and they did not put as much effort in the PC version.

EA told it themselfs they simply said that the 360 version has the best gfx of the MW games.

This isn't a discussion, it's a simple FACT

arabnight · Post by **arabnight** » 23 Mar 2007, 02:16

i know what u mean but i just was saying i just dont understand how ppl can put the 360 to a computer

i don't want to make a argument out of it Stig i just got heated cause so many ppl are saying there 360 is better then a great PC of anyones

Post by **YaelDjiel** » 23 Mar 2007, 02:38

it is, for now
it will soon fall behind..... like any other console

Post by **TheStig** » 23 Mar 2007, 02:39

In general YES the PC is better, but in this specific case (MW)
the 360 is simply better.

arabnight · Post by **arabnight** » 23 Mar 2007, 03:01

-nods- ok

Ajex · Post by **Ajex** » 26 Mar 2007, 20:08

In my own case, graphics, as long as they aren't, frankly, horrible, don't really bother me much. For example, let's say I have the option to get NFS:MW on either computer or ps2. Even if the PC version has more advanced graphics, I would still buy the Playstation 2 version because I prefer playing it on that particular console.

Fishwhiz · Post by **Fishwhiz** » 26 Mar 2007, 20:31

Excelent way to put it. but if it were carbon, i would get the pc version.

arabnight · Post by **arabnight** » 27 Mar 2007, 04:31

this might sound like im going back on the word of when im fighting over pc and xbox360 but graphic is a great thing to have to make it look more life like but i mean i still go back to play nfs4 cause its a great game graphics dont matter then cause the game play makes up for it so much

D00MST3R · Post by **D00MST3R** » 24 Apr 2007, 10:11

Look guys nothin' have change since NFSU just the MW was a change... Carbon is a
remix as Korge said, And NFSU2 was nothing against NFSU just some tuning. Carbon have been just faked up all moding and graphic are sucking... Simulation and Arcade have diffrence but it seems like they are making players stupids and nothing, Most of them(players) never realise that. Role playing racing game!!

what a concept just for fun they have been add some videos but none of us can make any choice in it everything is going just like a plan straight line. I've bored with NFS that's why I didn't buy CARBON yo! Yeah! 'tis fun to make vynils in photoshop and show them to others...
I advise that EA should cancel next game and delay it for 2 years... because they are making nothing just tweaking the old games with new engine and this is droppin'out the image of world famous NFS

Black Fire · Post by **Black Fire** » 27 Apr 2007, 01:31

Maybe make a MW Two with 2 player police chases like the good old days.

Tuners Rock · Post by **Tuners Rock** » 27 Apr 2007, 03:24

hmmmm, im surprised this topics still going on

korge · Post by **korge** » 02 Apr 2009, 15:07

All this comparison to PGR3 and Forza, and a few years later, NFS releases Shift.

Carcrazy · Post by **Carcrazy** » 08 Apr 2009, 06:14

Irony... one of EA's many specialties.

That, and jacking ideas. Or in your case, names.

Striker94 · Post by **Striker94** » 09 Apr 2009, 10:14

carcrazy, do u by any chance play pawngame?

Carcrazy · Post by **Carcrazy** » 10 Apr 2009, 07:06

I pwn every game.

Okay, honestly though - I have no idea what you're talking about.

korge · Post by **korge** » 10 Apr 2009, 07:11

lol silly carcrazy. He is talking about chess.

NFSUnlimited.net

Is NFS falling behind?

Re: Is NFS falling behind?

Re: Is NFS falling behind?

Re: Is NFS falling behind?

Re: Is NFS falling behind?

Re: Is NFS falling behind?