Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine
Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine
I like it too, xHaZxMaTx.
Also,
FINAL ENTRY
Clean and simple ftw.
Also,
FINAL ENTRY
Clean and simple ftw.
Last edited by Zero260 on 03 Dec 2007, 11:50, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine
You should feather the selection around the transonic cloud.
Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine
Fixed. Thank you, kind sir.
- boganbusman
- Unbeatable
- Posts: 5142
- Joined: 03 Sep 2004, 12:09
- Location: Mute City
- Contact:
Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine
The Hindenburg does not exist anymore, which is correct, but it did have a near-identical sister ship which was not destroyed. So according to you, in theory, I could disqualify everyone since they wouldn't be able to prove that their depicted vehicles still exist at this exact moment. And don't forget that the X-43 would fall under this rule instantly, since all X-43s are deliberately crashed at the end of their flights.xHaZxMaTx wrote:Then again, if you want to get really picky, you could disqualify Pabl0z's sig, because the Hindenburg doesn't exist, anymore, and you stated that whichever 'flying machine' we choose must exist, not have existed.
I'm getting off track though. I might have not made it very clear, but what I typed should read more like: "However, your chosen transport must have been known to exist and function at some time, in real life . . ."
Sorry for any confusion, I'll edit the first post appropriately.
Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine
So does that mean I get to keep my second entry?
- boganbusman
- Unbeatable
- Posts: 5142
- Joined: 03 Sep 2004, 12:09
- Location: Mute City
- Contact:
Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine
. . . yeah, whatever.xHaZxMaTx wrote:So does that mean I get to keep my second entry?
- Carcrazy
- Unbeatable
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: 28 May 2006, 05:08
- Location: /// .Happy in Exile. \\\
- Contact:
Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine
Hm, I may make one later...
- boganbusman
- Unbeatable
- Posts: 5142
- Joined: 03 Sep 2004, 12:09
- Location: Mute City
- Contact:
Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine
You better hurry it up, I'm closing this today.Carcrazy wrote:Hm, I may make one later...
- Porsche-AG
- Unbeatable
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 22 Jun 2006, 03:12
- Location: Canada
Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine
Mine's terrible... but I'll submit it anyways:
FINAL ENTRY
FINAL ENTRY
Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine
Start the poll lol
Explicit signature removed.
Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine
If you have to time to, I would suggest feathering or contracting the selection of the plane by 1 pixel - you still have some of the original background around the edges.
Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine
I have no time so it stays. Moreover when i tryed to feather it the plane would be no longer be visible, don't ask me why.
Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine
Probably because you're doing it wrong...
Select plane with lasso tool, then Select>Feather 1pix, then Select>Inverse, then press the Delete key however many times.
Select plane with lasso tool, then Select>Feather 1pix, then Select>Inverse, then press the Delete key however many times.
Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine
Oh yeah, feather selection ftw
- boganbusman
- Unbeatable
- Posts: 5142
- Joined: 03 Sep 2004, 12:09
- Location: Mute City
- Contact:
Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine
Ahem . . . I'm a bit late, but entries are now closed.
Poll will be up shortly.
Poll will be up shortly.