Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine

Everything that has to do with art goes into this board. Post your creations and hear what other people have to say about it!
User avatar
Zero260
Drift King
Drift King
Posts: 842
Joined: 17 Aug 2007, 08:44
Location: California

Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine

Post by Zero260 »

I like it too, xHaZxMaTx.

Also,
FINAL ENTRY
Image
Clean and simple ftw.
Last edited by Zero260 on 03 Dec 2007, 11:50, edited 2 times in total.
Image
User avatar
xHaZxMaTx
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 8940
Joined: 26 Jun 2005, 05:32
Location: Cali-for-ni-a

Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine

Post by xHaZxMaTx »

You should feather the selection around the transonic cloud.
Image
User avatar
Zero260
Drift King
Drift King
Posts: 842
Joined: 17 Aug 2007, 08:44
Location: California

Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine

Post by Zero260 »

Fixed. Thank you, kind sir.
Image
User avatar
boganbusman
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 5142
Joined: 03 Sep 2004, 12:09
Location: Mute City
Contact:

Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine

Post by boganbusman »

xHaZxMaTx wrote:Then again, if you want to get really picky, you could disqualify Pabl0z's sig, because the Hindenburg doesn't exist, anymore, and you stated that whichever 'flying machine' we choose must exist, not have existed. ;)
The Hindenburg does not exist anymore, which is correct, but it did have a near-identical sister ship which was not destroyed. So according to you, in theory, I could disqualify everyone since they wouldn't be able to prove that their depicted vehicles still exist at this exact moment. And don't forget that the X-43 would fall under this rule instantly, since all X-43s are deliberately crashed at the end of their flights.

I'm getting off track though. I might have not made it very clear, but what I typed should read more like: "However, your chosen transport must have been known to exist and function at some time, in real life . . ."
Sorry for any confusion, I'll edit the first post appropriately.
User avatar
xHaZxMaTx
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 8940
Joined: 26 Jun 2005, 05:32
Location: Cali-for-ni-a

Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine

Post by xHaZxMaTx »

So does that mean I get to keep my second entry?
Image
User avatar
Jopuma
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 5697
Joined: 21 Feb 2005, 02:06
Location: ...

Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine

Post by Jopuma »

Final Entry
Image
Image
User avatar
boganbusman
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 5142
Joined: 03 Sep 2004, 12:09
Location: Mute City
Contact:

Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine

Post by boganbusman »

xHaZxMaTx wrote:So does that mean I get to keep my second entry?
. . . yeah, whatever.
User avatar
Carcrazy
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 4082
Joined: 28 May 2006, 05:08
Location: /// .Happy in Exile. \\\
Contact:

Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine

Post by Carcrazy »

Hm, I may make one later... :P
Image
User avatar
YaelDjiel
NFSUnlimited Staff
NFSUnlimited Staff
Posts: 1829
Joined: 04 Oct 2005, 22:01
Location: Valthermond, NL

Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine

Post by YaelDjiel »

FINAL ENTRY
Image
Image
User avatar
boganbusman
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 5142
Joined: 03 Sep 2004, 12:09
Location: Mute City
Contact:

Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine

Post by boganbusman »

Carcrazy wrote:Hm, I may make one later... :P
You better hurry it up, I'm closing this today.
User avatar
Porsche-AG
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 2581
Joined: 22 Jun 2006, 03:12
Location: Canada

Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine

Post by Porsche-AG »

Mine's terrible... but I'll submit it anyways:

FINAL ENTRY
FINAL ENTRY
FINAL ENTRY
Image
User avatar
ImJ
Drift King
Drift King
Posts: 827
Joined: 23 Oct 2005, 21:27
Location: In a House

Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine

Post by ImJ »

Start the poll :evil: :evil: lol
Explicit signature removed.
User avatar
BrontoX
Professional
Professional
Posts: 1895
Joined: 25 Oct 2006, 12:42
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine

Post by BrontoX »

Haven't had good ideas lately:
FINAL ENTRY

Image
Image
User avatar
xHaZxMaTx
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 8940
Joined: 26 Jun 2005, 05:32
Location: Cali-for-ni-a

Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine

Post by xHaZxMaTx »

If you have to time to, I would suggest feathering or contracting the selection of the plane by 1 pixel - you still have some of the original background around the edges.
Image
User avatar
BrontoX
Professional
Professional
Posts: 1895
Joined: 25 Oct 2006, 12:42
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine

Post by BrontoX »

I have no time so it stays. Moreover when i tryed to feather it the plane would be no longer be visible, don't ask me why.
Image
User avatar
Zero260
Drift King
Drift King
Posts: 842
Joined: 17 Aug 2007, 08:44
Location: California

Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine

Post by Zero260 »

Probably because you're doing it wrong...

Select plane with lasso tool, then Select>Feather 1pix, then Select>Inverse, then press the Delete key however many times. :wink:
Image
User avatar
Dragster
NFSUnlimited Staff
NFSUnlimited Staff
Posts: 3132
Joined: 30 May 2004, 23:36
Location: Croatia
Contact:

Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine

Post by Dragster »

Oh yeah, feather selection ftw \:D/
Image
User avatar
boganbusman
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 5142
Joined: 03 Sep 2004, 12:09
Location: Mute City
Contact:

Re: Signature Competition #39 // Favourite Flying Machine

Post by boganbusman »

Ahem . . . I'm a bit late, but entries are now closed.

Poll will be up shortly.
Post Reply

Return to “Creativity Board”