PC vs Xbox 360 vs PS3 vs Wii

Video games, video games and video games! Racing games, console games, fps, rpg, The everything about video games board.

Which one ?

PC
55
49%
Xbox 360
17
15%
Playstation 3
30
27%
Nintendo Wii
8
7%
Atari 2600
2
2%
 
Total votes: 112

User avatar
xHaZxMaTx
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 8940
Joined: 26 Jun 2005, 05:32
Location: Cali-for-ni-a

Post by xHaZxMaTx »

103" is 8.5'. :P
Image
korge
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 5933
Joined: 09 Apr 2004, 20:37
Location: nfsunlimited.net

Post by korge »

xHaZxMaTx wrote:103" is 8.5'. :P
That is the diagonal viewing size of the screen. Im giving you dimensions of the entire unit. :wink:
User avatar
spartan.dk
Professional
Professional
Posts: 1270
Joined: 18 Sep 2005, 18:00
Location: Toronto, Canada

Post by spartan.dk »

A hundred and three inches, who the hell needs that big of a damned TV?
Kid Cro wrote:Now go Suck on your mom's boobie and stfuktnxbye!!!
User avatar
TheStig
NFSUnlimited Staff
NFSUnlimited Staff
Posts: 8740
Joined: 30 Jan 2004, 02:40
Location: The Netherlands

Post by TheStig »

And why do you want a Plasma... PLasma SUCKS!
Image
User avatar
WhereIsTheNsx
Drift King
Drift King
Posts: 743
Joined: 29 Jul 2005, 01:21
Location: Brooklyn NYC

Post by WhereIsTheNsx »

yea plasma does suk
Image
korge
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 5933
Joined: 09 Apr 2004, 20:37
Location: nfsunlimited.net

Post by korge »

Your point?
korge
User avatar
WhereIsTheNsx
Drift King
Drift King
Posts: 743
Joined: 29 Jul 2005, 01:21
Location: Brooklyn NYC

Post by WhereIsTheNsx »

plasma suks, duh
Image
User avatar
2furio
Valued Member
Valued Member
Posts: 2589
Joined: 04 Jun 2004, 19:41
Location: Romania
Contact:

Post by 2furio »

TheStig wrote:And why do you want a Plasma... PLasma SUCKS!
Indeed, I never liked Plasma TVs. First of all, they don't have a true HD resolution, most plasmas have a resolution of 1024x768, what's up with that??? It's not even wide-screen and I really feel like LCD Tvs offer much better quality...
korge
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 5933
Joined: 09 Apr 2004, 20:37
Location: nfsunlimited.net

Post by korge »

2furio wrote:
TheStig wrote:And why do you want a Plasma... PLasma SUCKS!
Indeed, I never liked Plasma TVs. First of all, they don't have a true HD resolution, most plasmas have a resolution of 1024x768, what's up with that??? It's not even wide-screen and I really feel like LCD Tvs offer much better quality...
Like what? Less heat transmission?

Pfff...
User avatar
Stereo
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 3942
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 19:33
Location: Outside your window

Post by Stereo »

Plasmaaaaaaaaa....
I dunno whats the difference between plasma and LCD. They're both flat and stylish. :D

BTW don't you think it would be hard to race on the Wii?
Image
User avatar
2furio
Valued Member
Valued Member
Posts: 2589
Joined: 04 Jun 2004, 19:41
Location: Romania
Contact:

Post by 2furio »

korge wrote:
2furio wrote:
TheStig wrote:And why do you want a Plasma... PLasma SUCKS!
Indeed, I never liked Plasma TVs. First of all, they don't have a true HD resolution, most plasmas have a resolution of 1024x768, what's up with that??? It's not even wide-screen and I really feel like LCD Tvs offer much better quality...
Like what? Less heat transmission?

Pfff...
It's ok if you can't afford one, but that doesn't mean to be jealous of others. :P Ok, so you want pros of LCDs over Plasmas, well get ready to be "pwnd":

1. Like I've stated before, most plasmas (run-of-the-mill) have 1024x768 which is not even true 720p.
2. Basically, LCDs have higher native resolutions (also, I have yet to see a 1080p Plasma, which can be bought by an average user)
3. LCDs definately consume less power (fact: could result in a 30% savings per year for electricity)
4. LCDs also have a longer life-span, Plasmas offer between 30,000 h and 60,000 hours, while LCDs GUARANTEE at least 60,000 hours
5. Screen burn? A thing of the past for LCDs but still a nightmare for Plasmas
6. LCDs offer a much clearer image. I have seen this myself. In the store, a Sharp 37" LCD was beside a LG 42" Plasma and one could clearly see the image on the Sharp TV was clearer and sharper (no pun intended)

But this thread is not about Plasma vs. LCD, so let's put that aside because we all know LCD is superior...
User avatar
Sir Ibi
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 3211
Joined: 09 Dec 2004, 06:56
Location: Warm cosy bed

Post by Sir Ibi »

sooooo... the PC, Xbox 360, PS3 and the Wii... great consoles ey guys? :lol:
korge
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 5933
Joined: 09 Apr 2004, 20:37
Location: nfsunlimited.net

Post by korge »

No one gives a damn on how much copy & paste Noob Eleet crap your on. If you dont like Plasmas, Good for you. No one really cares. Its a TV that you most likely cant afford anyways.

Lets be on our business. Btw, I didnt care to read your post either.
User avatar
WhereIsTheNsx
Drift King
Drift King
Posts: 743
Joined: 29 Jul 2005, 01:21
Location: Brooklyn NYC

Post by WhereIsTheNsx »

lol @ korge getting mad anytime he's wrong
Image
korge
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 5933
Joined: 09 Apr 2004, 20:37
Location: nfsunlimited.net

Post by korge »

WhereIsTheNsx wrote:lol @ korge getting mad anytime he's wrong
Alright. What am I wrong about?

Im mad becuase people need to stop gloating about their tech savvyness... You arent cool becuase you have a PC and know what a processor is.
User avatar
2furio
Valued Member
Valued Member
Posts: 2589
Joined: 04 Jun 2004, 19:41
Location: Romania
Contact:

Post by 2furio »

korge wrote:No one really cares. Its a TV that you most likely cant afford anyways.
And how you would you know I can't afford one, in fact we do have an LCD TV (32" Sharp) and planning on getting another one. We're definately not going back to tube TVs or ever consider plasma TVs. And like I've said before, no need to get so pissed, I was merely stating the facts, that's it. It's fun manipulating people... :P
-------------------------

Anyways, I was actually impressed by Sony's PS3 at E3. Many people were complaining and whinning..."Aww, it's too expensive....aww they stole Nintendo's controller". But I feel the price may be a little bit high but definately not over-priced. In terms of graphics, it will own Microsoft and its cheapo-quality Xbox 360 but I guess only time will tell...
User avatar
The Gravedigger
Professional
Professional
Posts: 1668
Joined: 10 Sep 2005, 12:35
Location: Gold Coast, Australia

Post by The Gravedigger »

2furio wrote:Anyways, I was actually impressed by Sony's PS3 at E3. Many people were complaining and whinning..."Aww, it's too expensive....aww they stole Nintendo's controller". But I feel the price may be a little bit high but definately not over-priced. In terms of graphics, it will own Microsoft and its cheapo-quality Xbox 360 but I guess only time will tell...
Unless they release a few million updates for it, and then you have to buy the newer software to get these new advantages + download some more updates, etc...

Still, going to get all three anyhow in order of.... Playstation 3, Nintendo Wii, Xbox 1.5
Image
User avatar
enzo.ph
Drift King
Drift King
Posts: 713
Joined: 28 Dec 2004, 10:30
Location: Philippines
Contact:

Post by enzo.ph »

WOW! you got a lot of mollah! i'll be happy with PS3.
Image
korge
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 5933
Joined: 09 Apr 2004, 20:37
Location: nfsunlimited.net

Post by korge »

The games on PS3 didnt look that much great...

For the cash, upgrade you PC to near top specs and buy a whole bunch of games...
korge
User avatar
TheStig
NFSUnlimited Staff
NFSUnlimited Staff
Posts: 8740
Joined: 30 Jan 2004, 02:40
Location: The Netherlands

Post by TheStig »

Korge I was to one that said that plasma SUCKED!
And if I want to go offtopic for it I will, and my point was simple. cause it does SUCK!
I had one before I bought my LCD tv (for 1 day to be specific cause I traded it it the next day for the LCD)
it was around the same price as the LCD tv I have now (1200 euro, multiply it by 1.2 to get the USD price) it was 2 cm shorter but the image quality was simply blurry especially from close by. it simply had a bad quality.

And stop being so pissed everytime you are wrong, you make yourself look stupid.
Image
User avatar
chemicalcode
Turbo Charged
Turbo Charged
Posts: 175
Joined: 11 Jul 2004, 01:05
Location: UK - Newcastle

Post by chemicalcode »

Yup, LCD is better for games, I've got a HD plasma and its better for TV than it is for games. 360 games look great but there is still a bit of ghosting, but the HD clips I've got on my pc look well sweet on it
Image
korge
Unbeatable
Unbeatable
Posts: 5933
Joined: 09 Apr 2004, 20:37
Location: nfsunlimited.net

Post by korge »

TheStig wrote: And stop being so pissed everytime you are wrong, you make yourself look stupid.
Tell me what I said that was wrong and I will take it back...


:roll:



You were the ones who ranted, I said STFU no one cares. Where am I wrong?
User avatar
TheStig
NFSUnlimited Staff
NFSUnlimited Staff
Posts: 8740
Joined: 30 Jan 2004, 02:40
Location: The Netherlands

Post by TheStig »

you where wrong cause there was nothing to STFU about!

you said what the point was in the comment plasma sucks.
well we explained it all, and you tell us to STFU... you asked for it. so we answer!
Image
User avatar
-hidden-
Drift King
Drift King
Posts: 410
Joined: 11 Jul 2005, 04:08
Location: Texas, Houston U.S. Birthdate: 08/09/93 -HiddeN-

Post by -hidden- »

with a ps3 you can get better graphics and higher speeds for less money so im gonna have to go wih that.
User avatar
Blazing Gallardo
Drift King
Drift King
Posts: 293
Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 23:14
Location: In a Lamborghini Gallardo

Post by Blazing Gallardo »

PS3 all the way. :D 8) second would be PC.Third would be xbox 360, and last forever the Nintendo WII. Nintendo was always last to me and would always be. :lol:
Image
Post Reply

Return to “The Games”