PC vs Xbox 360 vs PS3 vs Wii

by **xHaZxMaTx** » 16 Jun 2006, 22:34

103" is 8.5'.

by **korge** » 16 Jun 2006, 22:48

xHaZxMaTx wrote:103" is 8.5'.

That is the diagonal viewing size of the screen. Im giving you dimensions of the entire unit. :wink:

by **spartan.dk** » 18 Jun 2006, 23:10

A hundred and three inches, who the hell needs that big of a damned TV?

by **TheStig** » 19 Jun 2006, 04:26

And why do you want a Plasma... PLasma SUCKS!

by **WhereIsTheNsx** » 19 Jun 2006, 06:47

yea plasma does suk

by **korge** » 19 Jun 2006, 07:15

Your point?

by **WhereIsTheNsx** » 20 Jun 2006, 08:46

plasma suks, duh

Website · by **2furio** » 20 Jun 2006, 20:46

TheStig wrote:And why do you want a Plasma... PLasma SUCKS!

Indeed, I never liked Plasma TVs. First of all, they don't have a true HD resolution, most plasmas have a resolution of 1024x768, what's up with that??? It's not even wide-screen and I really feel like LCD Tvs offer much better quality...

by **korge** » 20 Jun 2006, 20:56

2furio wrote:
TheStig wrote:And why do you want a Plasma... PLasma SUCKS!

Indeed, I never liked Plasma TVs. First of all, they don't have a true HD resolution, most plasmas have a resolution of 1024x768, what's up with that??? It's not even wide-screen and I really feel like LCD Tvs offer much better quality...

Like what? Less heat transmission?

Pfff...

by **Stereo** » 21 Jun 2006, 02:09

Plasmaaaaaaaaa....
I dunno whats the difference between plasma and LCD. They're both flat and stylish.

BTW don't you think it would be hard to race on the Wii?

Website · by **2furio** » 21 Jun 2006, 02:34

korge wrote:
2furio wrote:
TheStig wrote:And why do you want a Plasma... PLasma SUCKS!

Indeed, I never liked Plasma TVs. First of all, they don't have a true HD resolution, most plasmas have a resolution of 1024x768, what's up with that??? It's not even wide-screen and I really feel like LCD Tvs offer much better quality...

Like what? Less heat transmission?

Pfff...

It's ok if you can't afford one, but that doesn't mean to be jealous of others.

Ok, so you want pros of LCDs over Plasmas, well get ready to be "pwnd":

1. Like I've stated before, most plasmas (run-of-the-mill) have 1024x768 which is not even true 720p.
2. Basically, LCDs have higher native resolutions (also, I have yet to see a 1080p Plasma, which can be bought by an average user)
3. LCDs definately consume less power (fact: could result in a 30% savings per year for electricity)
4. LCDs also have a longer life-span, Plasmas offer between 30,000 h and 60,000 hours, while LCDs GUARANTEE at least 60,000 hours
5. Screen burn? A thing of the past for LCDs but still a nightmare for Plasmas
6. LCDs offer a much clearer image. I have seen this myself. In the store, a Sharp 37" LCD was beside a LG 42" Plasma and one could clearly see the image on the Sharp TV was clearer and sharper (no pun intended)

But this thread is not about Plasma vs. LCD, so let's put that aside because we all know LCD is superior...

by **Sir Ibi** » 21 Jun 2006, 02:39

sooooo... the PC, Xbox 360, PS3 and the Wii... great consoles ey guys? :lol:

by **korge** » 21 Jun 2006, 02:48

No one gives a damn on how much copy & paste Noob Eleet crap your on. If you dont like Plasmas, Good for you. No one really cares. Its a TV that you most likely cant afford anyways.

Lets be on our business. Btw, I didnt care to read your post either.

by **WhereIsTheNsx** » 21 Jun 2006, 05:29

lol @ korge getting mad anytime he's wrong

by **korge** » 21 Jun 2006, 05:46

WhereIsTheNsx wrote:lol @ korge getting mad anytime he's wrong

Alright. What am I wrong about?

Im mad becuase people need to stop gloating about their tech savvyness... You arent cool becuase you have a PC and know what a processor is.

Website · by **2furio** » 21 Jun 2006, 15:14

korge wrote:No one really cares. Its a TV that you most likely cant afford anyways.

And how you would you know I can't afford one, in fact we do have an LCD TV (32" Sharp) and planning on getting another one. We're definately not going back to tube TVs or ever consider plasma TVs. And like I've said before, no need to get so pissed, I was merely stating the facts, that's it. It's fun manipulating people...

-------------------------

Anyways, I was actually impressed by Sony's PS3 at E3. Many people were complaining and whinning..."Aww, it's too expensive....aww they stole Nintendo's controller". But I feel the price may be a little bit high but definately not over-priced. In terms of graphics, it will own Microsoft and its cheapo-quality Xbox 360 but I guess only time will tell...

by **The Gravedigger** » 21 Jun 2006, 15:17

2furio wrote:Anyways, I was actually impressed by Sony's PS3 at E3. Many people were complaining and whinning..."Aww, it's too expensive....aww they stole Nintendo's controller". But I feel the price may be a little bit high but definately not over-priced. In terms of graphics, it will own Microsoft and its cheapo-quality Xbox 360 but I guess only time will tell...

Unless they release a few million updates for it, and then you have to buy the newer software to get these new advantages + download some more updates, etc...

Still, going to get all three anyhow in order of.... Playstation 3, Nintendo Wii, Xbox 1.5

by **enzo.ph** » 21 Jun 2006, 15:26

WOW! you got a lot of mollah! i'll be happy with PS3.

by **korge** » 21 Jun 2006, 15:53

The games on PS3 didnt look that much great...

For the cash, upgrade you PC to near top specs and buy a whole bunch of games...

by **TheStig** » 23 Jun 2006, 06:51

Korge I was to one that said that plasma SUCKED!
And if I want to go offtopic for it I will, and my point was simple. cause it does SUCK!
I had one before I bought my LCD tv (for 1 day to be specific cause I traded it it the next day for the LCD)
it was around the same price as the LCD tv I have now (1200 euro, multiply it by 1.2 to get the USD price) it was 2 cm shorter but the image quality was simply blurry especially from close by. it simply had a bad quality.

And stop being so pissed everytime you are wrong, you make yourself look stupid.

by **chemicalcode** » 23 Jun 2006, 14:45

Yup, LCD is better for games, I've got a HD plasma and its better for TV than it is for games. 360 games look great but there is still a bit of ghosting, but the HD clips I've got on my pc look well sweet on it

by **korge** » 23 Jun 2006, 16:45

TheStig wrote:And stop being so pissed everytime you are wrong, you make yourself look stupid.

Tell me what I said that was wrong and I will take it back...

:roll:

You were the ones who ranted, I said STFU no one cares. Where am I wrong?

by **TheStig** » 23 Jun 2006, 19:34

you where wrong cause there was nothing to STFU about!

you said what the point was in the comment plasma sucks.
well we explained it all, and you tell us to STFU... you asked for it. so we answer!

by **-hidden-** » 04 Jul 2006, 19:14

with a ps3 you can get better graphics and higher speeds for less money so im gonna have to go wih that.

by **Blazing Gallardo** » 19 Jul 2006, 20:03

PS3 all the way.

second would be PC.Third would be xbox 360, and last forever the Nintendo WII. Nintendo was always last to me and would always be. :lol:

PC vs Xbox 360 vs PS3 vs Wii

Which one ?

Who is online