Undercover Reviews Part 1
Undercover Reviews Part 1
1UP - 80%
PSX Extreme - 80%
TeamXbox - 80%
Daily Game - 78%
GameZone - 70%
Totally360 - 70%
Gameplayer - 65%
Videogamer - 60%
PSX Extreme - 80%
TeamXbox - 80%
Daily Game - 78%
GameZone - 70%
Totally360 - 70%
Gameplayer - 65%
Videogamer - 60%
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
Are you trying to skew Undercover's image by not posting the bad reviews?
By the way, 1UP gave the game a "B" which is more like a 75%. An "A-" would be 80%.
By the way, 1UP gave the game a "B" which is more like a 75%. An "A-" would be 80%.
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
Well If u ask me :
elie8 : 90% !!!!!!!!
elie8 : 90% !!!!!!!!
What Comes Around, Goes Around ...
- TheNoobofFerraris
- Professional
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 18:31
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
elie8 wrote:Well If u ask me :
elie8 : 90% !!!!!!!!
To save myself from flaming.
Seems like this website is a ghost town. No longer worth a visit or anyone's time.
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
The title says Part 1. Maybe this is only the first half of the reviews, the good ones.2furio wrote:Are you trying to skew Undercover's image by not posting the bad reviews?
korge
- kostis1993
- Turbo Charged
- Posts: 86
- Joined: 02 Jul 2008, 10:09
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
Good or bad, these reviews are giving me some hope for sure!!!
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
I think there's a conspiracy going on. Bojan is being paid by EA to make Undercover look like a good game and say only nice things about it.
- DriftingFan
- Turbo Charged
- Posts: 51
- Joined: 12 Oct 2007, 23:33
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
i'm still getting the game regardless the reviews
"Fuel burning fast on an empty tank." Cake, The Distance
PSN ID: DriftingFan
PSN ID: DriftingFan
- kostis1993
- Turbo Charged
- Posts: 86
- Joined: 02 Jul 2008, 10:09
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
I don't care what Bojan does. The good part is that some people rated this game high. I've also read the bad reviews(and first of all the 4.0 from ign) but now I see that things are not too bad. I don't know if the bad reviews will be posted but it's good to know there are reviewers telling the game has some solid elements. That's all from me!
And hope EA will release a patch for the frame rate problems. And another question. All these guys writing the reviews probably had also previewed the game and played it for 2+ hours. Then why didn't they say at the preview that the gps is not good or that Highway Battle is too easy? The say they want to play the full game to be sure but some bad parts of undercover were visible from the demo. The only one(and most important) mentioned was the frame rate but they hoped it would be fixed(and were wrong).
And hope EA will release a patch for the frame rate problems. And another question. All these guys writing the reviews probably had also previewed the game and played it for 2+ hours. Then why didn't they say at the preview that the gps is not good or that Highway Battle is too easy? The say they want to play the full game to be sure but some bad parts of undercover were visible from the demo. The only one(and most important) mentioned was the frame rate but they hoped it would be fixed(and were wrong).
Last edited by kostis1993 on 19 Nov 2008, 23:07, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
TheNoobOfFerraries : U can flame all you want but i'll still like undercover a lot !!
What Comes Around, Goes Around ...
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
Have you even played the game? Or are you living in imaginationland?
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
IGN's review was already posted in a news article on monday. Average rating atm for the 360 version is 66%.
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
There is the reality of it.Bojan wrote:IGN's review was already posted in a news article on monday. Average rating atm for the 360 version is 66%.
korge
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
well ... if they manage to actually fix the framerate problem, i think all ratings will go up up and WAAAYYY up...
that's one of the MAIN reasons the game's been rated so low imho
that's one of the MAIN reasons the game's been rated so low imho
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
PSZeta: Of course i have played the game !! didn't u read my previous posts !!
What Comes Around, Goes Around ...
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
Aswell these scores are still opinions about the writers that wrote it and played the game...
You shouldn't take over their opinion, but you should put it togheter with your own thoughts and then make the (probable) conclusion that you'll have about the game, if it's good buy it if it isn't then don't
Well that's the way to handle those reviews (IMO!).. so people don't take these reviews to critical.. they're still other people's opinions
Myself.. I think I'll be getting the game.. but not in a hurry... I haven't quite made up my mind yet, I can't find myself in the heavy critic reviews and neither in the (more) positive ones
But HF and enjoy Undercover all
You shouldn't take over their opinion, but you should put it togheter with your own thoughts and then make the (probable) conclusion that you'll have about the game, if it's good buy it if it isn't then don't
Well that's the way to handle those reviews (IMO!).. so people don't take these reviews to critical.. they're still other people's opinions
Myself.. I think I'll be getting the game.. but not in a hurry... I haven't quite made up my mind yet, I can't find myself in the heavy critic reviews and neither in the (more) positive ones
But HF and enjoy Undercover all
- Carcrazy
- Unbeatable
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: 28 May 2006, 05:08
- Location: /// .Happy in Exile. \\\
- Contact:
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
IMO, I'd give it about an 85%. It's definitely a repeat of the older games, but I can't see much that they lied about this time...
(This score is actually great because, no matter how long you make the production cycle (longer the better, though,) you will never be able to get a true hit out of a yearly release, that's pretty much the end of it. There could always be a few occasional golden stars, but don't count on it. The reason for this is simply that, not only are people used to the product, but they also have soooo many games from past years that it doesn't really matter as much if they have this one new one.)
Plus I max it out @ 1680x1050 on an 8600GT.
(This score is actually great because, no matter how long you make the production cycle (longer the better, though,) you will never be able to get a true hit out of a yearly release, that's pretty much the end of it. There could always be a few occasional golden stars, but don't count on it. The reason for this is simply that, not only are people used to the product, but they also have soooo many games from past years that it doesn't really matter as much if they have this one new one.)
Plus I max it out @ 1680x1050 on an 8600GT.
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
Then you are content with paying over $50 for a game that you have already played?
korge
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
@ Korge : if it deserves every cent of the 50+$, then yes i'll definetly buy it, and that is the case of Undercover !! // Believe that !!
What Comes Around, Goes Around ...
- kostis1993
- Turbo Charged
- Posts: 86
- Joined: 02 Jul 2008, 10:09
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
8600? I have this card too!!! I want it !! And opinion is something personal. For example I have Bully for PC. Most reviews say it's a bad port, full of bugs and frame rate problems but I don't have a single problem! OK, the graphics are not maxed(shadows off), but the frame rate is stable most of the times and the graphics are still good. I enjoy the game a lot even if it crap(this is what the reviews say)Carcrazy wrote:IMO, I'd give it about an 85%. It's definitely a repeat of the older games, but I can't see much that they lied about this time...
(This score is actually great because, no matter how long you make the production cycle (longer the better, though,) you will never be able to get a true hit out of a yearly release, that's pretty much the end of it. There could always be a few occasional golden stars, but don't count on it. The reason for this is simply that, not only are people used to the product, but they also have soooo many games from past years that it doesn't really matter as much if they have this one new one.)
Plus I max it out @ 1680x1050 on an 8600GT.
- KammyworldRacerGT4
- Drift King
- Posts: 787
- Joined: 10 Jul 2007, 02:44
- Location: In my Tuning Garage, where else?
- Contact:
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
FnF wrote:Aswell these scores are still opinions about the writers that wrote it and played the game...
You shouldn't take over their opinion, but you should put it togheter with your own thoughts and then make the (probable) conclusion that you'll have about the game, if it's good buy it if it isn't then don't
Well that's the way to handle those reviews (IMO!).. so people don't take these reviews to critical.. they're still other people's opinions
Myself.. I think I'll be getting the game.. but not in a hurry... I haven't quite made up my mind yet, I can't find myself in the heavy critic reviews and neither in the (more) positive ones
But HF and enjoy Undercover all
THANK YOU! That's EXACTLY what I said in the GameTrailers Review Topic.
*sig removed for being too big. max size 550x120px & 50kb*
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
80% = B+
But from what I gather... Stay away on PC3 and see if it will even work on your PC.
But from what I gather... Stay away on PC3 and see if it will even work on your PC.
- bluestreak908
- Turbo Charged
- Posts: 71
- Joined: 31 Mar 2008, 05:21
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
if they gave the game a B then that is 84-87%, and an A- is 90-93%2furio wrote:Are you trying to skew Undercover's image by not posting the bad reviews?
By the way, 1UP gave the game a "B" which is more like a 75%. An "A-" would be 80%.
at least that's how the grades work in my school and pretty much everywhere else i think...
TUNERS ROCK!!!
Re: Undercover Reviews Part 1
Maybe in America. Then again, America was always weird about everything. It would make sense then since 1UP is an American website.bluestreak908 wrote:if they gave the game a B then that is 84-87%, and an A- is 90-93%2furio wrote:Are you trying to skew Undercover's image by not posting the bad reviews?
By the way, 1UP gave the game a "B" which is more like a 75%. An "A-" would be 80%.
at least that's how the grades work in my school and pretty much everywhere else i think...