Bitrate changer
Bitrate changer
Does anyone know of a nice bitrate cahnging tool. I know there are many in the web, but there are mostly ad/spy-ware transporters.
What I want is just a bitrate changer and nothing more, since there are more complicated programs that do other things, but I only need that.
If it is freeware it would be even better.
What I want is just a bitrate changer and nothing more, since there are more complicated programs that do other things, but I only need that.
If it is freeware it would be even better.
Change the bitrate of what? A video file? An audio file?
Changing the bitrate of any video file always means re-encoding the content, which makes it a not-so-easy thing to do (plus it tends to ruin the quality).
Changing the bitrate of any video file always means re-encoding the content, which makes it a not-so-easy thing to do (plus it tends to ruin the quality).
Last edited by vellu on 07 Apr 2006, 16:57, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Turbo Charged
- Posts: 140
- Joined: 07 Feb 2006, 22:52
- prince1142003
- Valued Member
- Posts: 3862
- Joined: 23 Feb 2005, 06:03
- Location: Enjoying college life.
- Contact:
you could also try mediamonkey at http://www.mediamonkey.com. the free version supports unlimited encoding, as well as a full fledged audio player with a music library that can rival WinAmp and Windows Media Player's
>Slap head< Sorry, I forgot about that. Mp3.vellu wrote:Change the bitrate of what? A video file? An audio file?
Changing the bitrate of any video file always means re-encoding the content, which makes it a not-so-easy thing to do (plus it tends to ruin the quality).
I tryed 4music thing before and I didn't like it. I will try with the other one.
-
- Turbo Charged
- Posts: 140
- Joined: 07 Feb 2006, 22:52
Yeah, I was gonna suggest the same thing.Harpal Hoonjan wrote:dBpowerAMP is also good software to use. It's a music format converter and bitrate changer, very user friendly.
dBpowerAMP is the best for beginners. It's a 1-click-tool but it still gives you great quality. But when you want to re-encode (change bitrate or sampling frequency) it's always important to have the proper codecs on your computer. If not, you won't get the best results. The best codec right now, is the Lame codec. Just get the newest.
I know, it won't make the quality better, but it's handy for mp3-players and stuff like that. Or if you want to burn more tracks to one cd without burning it as an mp3-cd.Jmac- wrote:Just an FYI, increasing the bitrate of an MP3 file won't make the sound quality any better; it'll just make a bigger file ...
- boganbusman
- Unbeatable
- Posts: 5142
- Joined: 03 Sep 2004, 12:09
- Location: Mute City
- Contact:
- The Gravedigger
- Professional
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: 10 Sep 2005, 12:35
- Location: Gold Coast, Australia
- The Gravedigger
- Professional
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: 10 Sep 2005, 12:35
- Location: Gold Coast, Australia
You notice the difference with a quality sound card, and/or quality speakers. Or in the case of an Mp3 player..... quality headphones
I used to think that anything above 192 was overkill, got to my Compaq and 256 was the way to go, now since getting the sound card, anything less than stated earlier is sheer pain
Oh, but there are 96kbps and 128kbps Mp3 quality songs that I have that sound a lot clearer than most 320kbps Mp3's, sounds illogical I know... but it's true
I used to think that anything above 192 was overkill, got to my Compaq and 256 was the way to go, now since getting the sound card, anything less than stated earlier is sheer pain
Oh, but there are 96kbps and 128kbps Mp3 quality songs that I have that sound a lot clearer than most 320kbps Mp3's, sounds illogical I know... but it's true
Anything less than 1411 kbps is not CD quality sound ...Koffy wrote:Thing is my mp3 palyer is 128mb.
And about going higher than 128kbps: 128 kbps is suposed to be CD quality sound. So if you go higher than 196kbps (cristal audio) it would have no justification. I don't know.
Ps: I chacked again, and most of my mp3 are 196kbps. (only some are 128.)
Hmm... Maybe I should try ripping my music higher than 128kbps then, since I have the speakers and sound card for it, and then just change the bitrate for my MP3 player...The Gravedigger wrote:You notice the difference with a quality sound card, and/or quality speakers. Or in the case of an Mp3 player..... quality headphones
I used to think that anything above 192 was overkill, got to my Compaq and 256 was the way to go, now since getting the sound card, anything less than stated earlier is sheer pain
Oh, but there are 96kbps and 128kbps Mp3 quality songs that I have that sound a lot clearer than most 320kbps Mp3's, sounds illogical I know... but it's true
If you have the space, why not ? WMA Lossless is only about 300-400 MB per CD, which is practically nothing considering most computers nowadays have at least 100 GB of hard drive space ...xHaZxMaTx wrote:Hmm... Maybe I should try ripping my music higher than 128kbps then, since I have the speakers and sound card for it, and then just change the bitrate for my MP3 player...The Gravedigger wrote:You notice the difference with a quality sound card, and/or quality speakers. Or in the case of an Mp3 player..... quality headphones
I used to think that anything above 192 was overkill, got to my Compaq and 256 was the way to go, now since getting the sound card, anything less than stated earlier is sheer pain
Oh, but there are 96kbps and 128kbps Mp3 quality songs that I have that sound a lot clearer than most 320kbps Mp3's, sounds illogical I know... but it's true
While most people can't notice the difference between 320 kbps and CD because 320 kbps basically just removes low-volume, high-frequency (16 kHz and up) information, which is inaudible to most people, any lower bitrates start to remove higher volume, lower frequency information. If you have a sound system with a large amount of dynamic range, you will definitely notice the loss of the subtle nuances in the background if you use lower bitrate music.
Here's a good visual example of what I'm talking about - http://www.caraudio.com/forum/showthread.php?t=114272
The reason why some high-bitrate songs sound like crap is because people take a low bitrate song and re-encode it at a higher bitrate thinking it'll sound better but, as I said earlier, all it does it produce a larger file that sounds exactly the same.
- GINIX_2007
- Professional
- Posts: 1113
- Joined: 12 Oct 2005, 03:29
- Location: Its an ENIGMA
- Contact:
@ Jmac-: Wow, I guess that does make quite a difference, thanks for the info. BTW, nice avatar.
And just so you know, this is my sounds system for my comp:
Logitech X-530
Creative Sound Blaster Live! 24-bit External
And just so you know, this is my sounds system for my comp:
Logitech X-530
Creative Sound Blaster Live! 24-bit External
I don't know, that is what Sonic Foundry sayd... (sounded a little odd to me but I sayd, why not).Jmac- wrote:Anything less than 1411 kbps is not CD quality sound ...
In my comp I have the onboard Nvidia sound board. I know it is definitely not the best there is, but I am comfortable with it, and for speaker I have standard Genius desktop speakers. They are not great, but they are pretty decent for its price.
As home sound system I have a ganeric DVD player, and a JVC 80's made amp. 75Watt x 2 Jensen spaekers. I think the woofer is about 12 inches. I don't use it for music to often, I use it more for wiewing movies, so I don't play my mp3 in Hight end sound systems.