Top 10 fastest production supercars

SuperString · Post by **SuperString** » 22 Nov 2006, 00:03

Check out this site:

http://cars.uk.msn.com/News/Top_ten_art ... id=1304640

SuperString · Post by **SuperString** » 22 Nov 2006, 00:14

What I find suprising is that S7 TT didn't break 200mph, if the info on the site is correct.

R34GTR · Post by **R34GTR** » 22 Nov 2006, 00:49

'Cause maybe no one had the balls to push it even further

steelsnake00 · Post by **steelsnake00** » 22 Nov 2006, 01:50

Because it ISNT A PRODUCTION CAR

boganbusman · Post by **boganbusman** » 22 Nov 2006, 02:15

Umm . . . I'm pretty sure the Saleen is a production car

darknight788 · Post by **darknight788** » 22 Nov 2006, 02:24

thats what i was thinking i know the TT version is also

Post by **TheStig** » 22 Nov 2006, 08:13

Maybe it could go faster but it was so damn scary that no one was willing to even try it and risk their lives.

RVD · Post by **RVD** » 22 Nov 2006, 09:30

but what do they mean with 'fastest'?? fastest from 0-60 (0-100) ? highest top speed?? fastest around a circuit??

On the site there actually were cars i've never heard of (1 or 2)

steelsnake00 · Post by **steelsnake00** » 22 Nov 2006, 13:18

By the way, that Bristol Fighter, when not electorincally restricted, would be the fastest production car in the world.
Oh, and its Â£600k cheaper than a Veyron, not so ugly, and BRITISH

KalRulesUK · Post by **KalRulesUK** » 22 Nov 2006, 18:27

the fastest car in the world (top speed) which is road legal is now the barabus tkr which does 270 mph, Â£300,000 and 0-60 in 1.83 sec bad thing is its not going to be produced till next year with i think 500 to be sold in the uk

boganbusman · Post by **boganbusman** » 23 Nov 2006, 02:20

steelsnake00 wrote:Oh, and its Â£600k cheaper than a Veyron, not so ugly, and BRITISH

Oh, so it's going to fall apart when I'm doing 300mph. Brilliant!

R34GTR · Post by **R34GTR** » 23 Nov 2006, 02:44

Oh stop with the British Bashing

darknight788 · Post by **darknight788** » 23 Nov 2006, 07:27

seriously there is no way i would be caught riding in that thing, all it does is give me 1005 more reasons to kill myself

xHaZxMaTx · Post by **xHaZxMaTx** » 23 Nov 2006, 07:31

boganbusman wrote:
steelsnake00 wrote:Oh, and its Â£600k cheaper than a Veyron, not so ugly, and BRITISH
Oh, so it's going to fall apart when I'm doing 300mph. Brilliant!

They seemed to know their stuff in WWII.

Spitfire, FTW!

boganbusman · Post by **boganbusman** » 23 Nov 2006, 07:36

lol I'm j/k. I like British cars. Many of them are notoriously unreliable though . . .

Btw, I would much rather be doing 400kmh in a Veyron rather than that Fighter thing.
The Fighter doesn't generate any downforce, and although that makes it really slippery through the air, it wouldn't be anywhere near as stable/safe as a Veyron.

xHaZxMaTx · Post by **xHaZxMaTx** » 23 Nov 2006, 07:46

Eesh, no downforce?

Is it just me or does that seem plain stupid?

boganbusman · Post by **boganbusman** » 23 Nov 2006, 07:51

Well before Bristol made cars they made aeroplanes

I can't see much of a problem, the main thing is that they eliminated any lift. Still, I wouldn't be turning the steering wheel in a hurry.

KalRulesUK · Post by **KalRulesUK** » 23 Nov 2006, 09:08

darknight788

is you want to kill yorself get a jet engine car/motorbike as on the road legal motorbike if you cant do 300 mph you will got your money back

steelsnake00 · Post by **steelsnake00** » 23 Nov 2006, 14:09

boganbusman wrote:lol I'm j/k. I like British cars. Many of them are notoriously unreliable though . . .

Only the ones where they borrowed parts and electrics from European motors

SuperString · Post by **SuperString** » 30 Nov 2006, 01:34

steelsnake00 wrote:
boganbusman wrote:lol I'm j/k. I like British cars. Many of them are notoriously unreliable though . . .
Only the ones where they borrowed parts and electrics from European motors

Yeah, right

steelsnake00 · Post by **steelsnake00** » 30 Nov 2006, 02:02

True, anything ever made by anyone vaguely controlled by British Leyland fell apart.

SuperString · Post by **SuperString** » 30 Nov 2006, 02:14

steelsnake00 wrote:True, anything ever made by anyone vaguely controlled by British Leyland fell apart.

TVRs are somewhat unreliable form what i heard. Aren't they have british engines?
And if you refer to Vauxhall, can't agree more, it's GM.

steelsnake00 · Post by **steelsnake00** » 30 Nov 2006, 13:54

TVR engines are reliable, it's the electonis that fail. They're 20 years old British Leyland leftovers