Fast And Furious Tokyo Spy Footage

Serbiandude · Post by **Serbiandude** » 05 Nov 2005, 00:38

this is a spy footage filmed by annonomous
it appears to be fnf tokyo
appears to be nissan 350z and musscle car and a camera guy follwin em
u see for ur self

http://videos.streetfire.net/Player.asp ... 1B99BE&p=0

Drewb99 · Post by **Drewb99** » 05 Nov 2005, 01:55

I want to see Vin Diesel kill the damn bug who won't bugger off.

Pinecone · Post by **Pinecone** » 05 Nov 2005, 08:13

Those are some damn good drivers, being able to back up the mountain so quickly

James31278 · Post by **James31278** » 05 Nov 2005, 08:19

Pinecone wrote:Those are some damn good drivers, being able to back up the mountain so quickly

Uh they didnt, the movie was shortened because it probably took a while to get back up there. Or they had a shortcut.

boganbusman · Post by **boganbusman** » 05 Nov 2005, 08:25

Is the car in front supposed to spin out like that? Or is the driver just retarded?

Post by **Pabl0z** » 05 Nov 2005, 13:24

I think it's supposed to...
I don't think the drivers are some noobs

James31278 · Post by **James31278** » 05 Nov 2005, 15:08

I know for a fact the 350Z is lighter than that muscle car so if he can't drive why would he be spinning out.

boganbusman · Post by **boganbusman** » 05 Nov 2005, 15:24

Don't kid yourself. A 1970 Boss 302 weighs the same as a 350Z.

I'm not saying the car in the vid is a Mustang, but you get the point.

James31278 · Post by **James31278** » 05 Nov 2005, 15:42

boganbusman wrote:Don't kid yourself. A 1970 Boss 302 weighs the same as a 350Z.

I'm not saying the car in the vid is a Mustang, but you get the point.

I'm not sure how much a 70 boss weighs. The car in the video looks to be at least a 68 fastback.

The Gravedigger · Post by **The Gravedigger** » 05 Nov 2005, 15:55

If I'm not mistaken... the fastback mustang was actually lighter than the 70 boss stang
I'm not 100% sure, but I still think that sounds right...

Grez~Supra_RZ-S · Post by **Grez~Supra_RZ-S** » 05 Nov 2005, 16:33

Twin drifting is one of the most difficult driving techniques you can attempt.

James31278 · Post by **James31278** » 05 Nov 2005, 18:05

The Gravedigger wrote:If I'm not mistaken... the fastback mustang was actually lighter than the 70 boss stang
I'm not 100% sure, but I still think that sounds right...

I'm just gonna look and see how heavy a 70 Boss is. The 350Z is a little heavier, the Track Z is 3400lbs even the base is 3339lbs. The Boss is 3250lbs.

Drewb99 · Post by **Drewb99** » 05 Nov 2005, 20:55

The Mercury Cougar Eliminator is 3780 lbs with a 428, so somewhere around there - same chassis. Weight has more to do with understeer than spinning out though.

donaldgladden · Post by **donaldgladden** » 09 Nov 2005, 14:59

as long as Sparco dosent see the poor Z get backing into the cliff then we're alright

NFS7UNDERGROUND · Post by **NFS7UNDERGROUND** » 29 Nov 2005, 03:35

for some reason i can't watch the movie,i have RoadRunner DSL.

Hecubus · Post by **Hecubus** » 29 Nov 2005, 06:20

I'm gonna guess that the driver of the Z is supposed to spin out. To keep spinning out in that one spot, what, four times in a row? Seems deliberate.

And as far as the 350Z vs. Mustang thing goes, they'd weigh about the same, provided it was a small-block Mustang (although with a big-block, it'd be just shy of 4000lbs). Remember, the Mustang was nothing more than a rebodied Falcon (which was an economy car at the time), so in a relative sense, it wouldn't be that heavy. However, since much of the weight would be engine, it'd be a front-heavy car, which leads to understeer (again, worse in the big-block models). It could be caused to oversteer, be it through excessive use of the gas pedal, or just because the suspension was crap, but for the most part, the better balanced Z would be more prone to oversteer.

donaldgladden · Post by **donaldgladden** » 29 Nov 2005, 14:13

maybe it was the Muscle car's turn to own the imports. if you noticed in the first 2 movies that all of them got trashed aheh

James31278 · Post by **James31278** » 29 Nov 2005, 15:36

Maybe this stuff isnt really fast and the furious 3.