Report Edited Showroom Cars Here

Dragster · Post by **Dragster** » 03 Sep 2005, 17:14

Who told you that?

Post by **Pabl0z** » 03 Sep 2005, 17:47

I think that contrast change is too much... there should be some limitations!

Post by **TheStig** » 03 Sep 2005, 17:49

it was allowed to use in SR challenges for NFS U1 (te ingame shots was allowed to use motion blur (if you didn't have that option, cause else it would be useless) and to use things like lensflare and radial blur.

the rules for SRC 2 are in the hands of Dragster and the whole showroom is based mainly on total view, if alot is edited the goed directly in the recycle bin, some take time for us to let them pass or not. and sometimes we just did not see the edits (got alot to upload daily!)

there are no official rules to what not to edit, exept for that the car is not allowed to cange (removing the top, color changes, dif rims, other exhaust.. all stuff that is not in the game is not allowed)

we did not know the whole editing thing would become so HUGE, so we never written rules for other PS work.

coolcars · Post by **coolcars** » 03 Sep 2005, 19:59

u guys i think blurred rims overcontrast should be allowed cause u can still see how the car looks like right but for other things like color change or edited logos or nething like that should be deleted wat do uthink

Dragster · Post by **Dragster** » 03 Sep 2005, 20:11

Any part, from tire to roof, can't be edited AT ALL.

coolcars · Post by **coolcars** » 03 Sep 2005, 20:14

ok boss

Pigbenis · Post by **Pigbenis** » 03 Sep 2005, 21:15

korge · Post by **korge** » 03 Sep 2005, 21:20

What is edited?

Cpt.Razkit · Post by **Cpt.Razkit** » 03 Sep 2005, 21:23

korge wrote:What is edited?

yea, whats edited? there isnt anything wrong with it, expcept possibly the windows.... but his gfx card is soooo good that it makes cars look like that.... plus some little contrast & brightness effects....

vellu · Post by **vellu** » 03 Sep 2005, 21:42

Yup, nothing edited. Just enhanced contrast, which is allowed (when done to the whole car, not just part of the car).

Dunno, what gfx enzo has but not sure if it's "that" great... I could never make windows look like that on my card (6600GT which supports all possible features), windows are transparent for me...not solid like in enzo's picture(s). Sometimes I would like to have similar windows, but cannot.

Is there an effect I could disable to loose transparencies, anyone?

Post by **TheStig** » 04 Sep 2005, 06:45

his pic is because his GFX lacks power to enable some options like transparent windows and other light effects. so his windows look super dark,

the reason why overbright is not allowed is cause you change the color of the car/part into a whole dif color. and that is not allowed (like creating white rims for instance)

I personally don't have a problem with giving CF a bit darker tint to make it abit darker (more realitic) but aslong as it doesn't make it pitch black!

but then again I harly judge the uploaded cars so it is not up to me

enzo.ph · Post by **enzo.ph** » 05 Sep 2005, 05:55

Pigbenis wrote:Since noone has deleted it yet, I guess I'll report it then.

So here it is, ladies and gentlemen, the famoues Mitsubishi Lancer made by our one enzo.ph.

funny! check out the first two pages of this topic...

anyways i use to have nvidia mx440 as my gfx card thats why my cars looks so crapy before. what i did with my black evo was just contrast and brightness, thats all. its nothing compare to the extreme edits these days...

_cant_stop_ · Post by **_cant_stop_** » 05 Sep 2005, 20:47

i can't see anything wrong of enzo's car...

Dragster · Post by **Dragster** » 06 Sep 2005, 13:04

Because nothing is wrong...

Pigbenis · Post by **Pigbenis** » 06 Sep 2005, 16:29

http://www.nfsunlimited.net/underground ... /?id=29089

Are you schmucks happy now?

Andre_online · Post by **Andre_online** » 06 Sep 2005, 16:30

What's been edited? If you're referring to the lights, they look OK to me..

Pigbenis · Post by **Pigbenis** » 06 Sep 2005, 16:44

I'm refering to the lights. They're are edited. With lens flare. In a program called photoshop. Made by adobe. Made by... mankind?

YamahaATV · Post by **YamahaATV** » 06 Sep 2005, 17:03

Just gonna make this one clear....the lights yeah the ones in the front...nope he just took a picture while the lights were on...yeah in that program..yeah the one called need for speed underground 2...yeah that sounds about right

The reason I say the lights are not edited is because as you can see he has the car cut out but the light on the right side looks cut off so obviously he cut it off when he was cutting the pic out so no it has not been edited imo

and no i am not a "schmuck" whatever it is

Pigbenis · Post by **Pigbenis** » 06 Sep 2005, 17:11

BAH! I can't do anything right >.<

YamahaATV · Post by **YamahaATV** » 07 Sep 2005, 14:35

This might be a little bit too revealing IMO

http://www.nfsunlimited.net/underground ... /?id=14414

chemicalcode · Post by **chemicalcode** » 07 Sep 2005, 17:26

well it doesn't offend me

but i saw that the license plate has been edited out, dunno if that counts as a big editing no no

Post by **Pabl0z** » 07 Sep 2005, 19:16

I don't have a problem with the girl but i think removing the license plate is clearly editing, right?

Dragster · Post by **Dragster** » 07 Sep 2005, 19:57

It is editing, but it doesn't really affect the overall appearance of the car IMO...

Hmm, I'll discuss that one with others, thanks for report

Fishwhiz · Post by **Fishwhiz** » 07 Sep 2005, 22:34

dragster, why didnt my audi tt get accepted? it wasnt edited...

YamahaATV · Post by **YamahaATV** » 07 Sep 2005, 23:09

One of the pics probably didn't take up half the screen